Is it frowned upon....

[flyboys90]

Its all about capturing time and sharing it!as long as they are in focus you are on to a winner.Good luck.

 

[steve2109]

I think the way some pictures are processed actually brings out more of the character of the place and helps to show more detail, but i believe that the way a picture looks is down to your own individual taste, what might be amazing to you can be awful to someone else, don't worry about what people think of your pictures it is all about how you feel and what you like, just my 2 pence worth...

 

[krela]

It's all too easy to get caught up in the belief that better gear equates to better photographs. Better gear simply gives you better choices, it won't make you a better photographer. An iPhone or other smartphone is equally capable of capturing good images in the hands of a good photographer.

Except in low light, where iPhones and smartphones are utterly useless in anyone's hands. They simply don't work.

My experience on here, while only very short, tells me that good well exposed and framed images that detail the site accurately are preferable to 'arty' shots. Well, that's what I think anyway. But, I must confess, those images that have been captured beautifully by someone with a good camera and equally good technique do live in the memory longer.

Indeed, the emphasis here is on the location and the subject of the photographs. Ultimately that is what is important; great photography is nice, but not necessary.

If you do decide to get a 'pro' camera, just make sure to protect it well, especially in these unpredictable places we explore. There's something to be said for cheap easily replaceable gear in this type of activity

Either that or camera insurance, I've claimed on mine twice in 5 years and it's more than paid for the £7/month it costs me.

 

[Harry]

Nope, not at all! The photo's from your only report here are good, look forward to more!

 

[ObliqueStrategy]

Except in low light, where iPhones and smartphones are utterly useless in anyone's hands. They simply don't work.

I sort of agree with this. The iPhone, which I use btw, has a good f2.8 lens and can handle reasonably low levels of light quite well. There is of course a threshold, at which point it won't work well. The same is true of compact point and shoots, and of course dslr's. However if you must use a smartphone, there are apps that allow you to get better results akin to using a real camera. Each has their pluses and drawbacks. Of course, it's not a real substitute for a real camera, but the iPhone can deliver cracking results if you're patient and prepared to work at it. But you're right, if you're pushing for time and in low light, it wouldn't be my first choice either. Like all urban exploration, I guess it comes down to good planning and finding a solution that works for you

 

[Klayton]

I'm not bothered about the photography side of things, it's the subject that interests me.
And I'm glad I'm not the only one using a camera phone!

This is true for me as well. I take photos, but they're very rarely "good" ones. Their only function is to help me remember the place, and maybe to show to others if they're interested.

Taking a lot of photos does increase the chances of getting a few good ones. But then I feel like if I'm snapping away the whole time I'm not really experiencing the thing itself.

 

[chaoticreason]

You do not need an expensive camera to take good photos,just imagination.
This is not a photog forum,but a site where we experince other peoples percerption of the places they have visited.
My shots are all crap photographically speaking,but I hope to imbue the viiewer with a modicum of that which I felt at the site,place,etc.

 

[Pen15]

Hello UrbexMami,

I would just like back up the comments made by all the good folks and friends I have on this site.

I am a professional photographer with over 20 years under my belt. I would like to state that when I look at other folk's images I look at the picture content, not the standard that the author has. It doesn't interest me in the slightest if an image is taken on a cell phone or a top of the range Nikon or Canon. I think I can safely say that the majority of people see this too.

My understanding is that Derelict Places is a forum about "Derelict Places". It is for those who have "quirky hobbies" as one of my friend’s points out. I can understand the purest, saying that enhancement takes away the true vision and find. I can agree with the above statements made. It is all about what you see and whether you put that down in your own way shouldn't matter. The main thing is enjoy what you do, don't be put off by other stuff you see. I am very guilty of playing with images as most on here will know. I tend to interpret what I see myself. My main reason is to show that place as I see it. After all that is the sole purpose here, which is to enjoy one another’s finds.

I hope you keep going at it and grow stronger with all the great words of encouragement from your friends here

 

[UrbexMami]

Thank you all so much for your input. I truly appreciate it. Your words of advice have really helped.
We are still planning on exploring the old Munitions bunkers near us, so hoping to test my "skills" then.
Thank you all again x