Thanks for the interest and queries.
The listing and demolition option does seem bizarre at first sight.
To try to explain (and I don’t find this easy), I understand:
1. There is a common understanding that the condition of the whole structure is so compromised that the building cannot be saved. It was built in a very odd way and left unfinished by 1939 (there are still unused RSJs from the time on site). It has suffered from water penetration that has allowed steel to rust, expand and make huge cracks. The professional structural survey report on the building shows how serious the problem is. (I have a copy of the report).Nor is there any significant in the structure.
2.The listing means that the building’s owners or developers will now need listed building consent and further planning permission for demolition from Ealing LBC. This means that the demolition cannot go ahead without consent and the observation of conditions set in the process (Such conditions would come from EH, DCMS, Ealing LBC and from advice from Twentieth Century Society and the Tiles and Architectural Ceramics Socity). The developers would have to bear the cost of such conditions.
3. English Heritage (and presumably the DCMS) see the chip shop itself alone as being of value and interest. EH and the conservation bodies involved want the whole shop frontage, the furniture and fittings, the nice tiles etc all to be removed and go to museum type conservation.
4. There are variety of museum options. Some have been proposed above. I don’t think it would be useful for me to speculate on them here.
If you are interested in housing the frontage and fittings of a fish and chip shop I would be pleased to put you in touch with owners.
I can see there is an urgency to getting on with this. It would be a real shame to se the whole lot being lost through arson or…
That done, can I say that I think it can still be a good result. The owners, the architect and the other parties all want to do the right thing.
Cheers, Cinestep