forget Canon and go for the Pentax K5 ... I am soooo tempted to get one - despite the rest of my Kit being Canon and having been a Canon man all mi life.
well i currently have a 1000d , and id feel a bit silly putting 800 quids worth of lens on a 300 quid camera, i have a few lens` now inc a 50mm prime f1.8, a 28 90 mm ultrasonic and a cheapo tamron 70-300, and of course the kit lens thats only good as a paper weight, ahhhh i dont know, is it worth me buying a bling body then ??
UrbanX said:Nope.
Like Krela said, [the greater] 90% of the image quality is from the lens. The 1000D is a more than adequate body.
The 50mm f1.8 is the best lens in the world, and should be £750, not £75!
Zoom lenses are the hardest things to get right tho, I've never found one that does everything I want!
They're chuffing expensive tho. I mean a GOOD zoom lens is the same price as 2 laptops, or 8,000 miles in a hatchback. You have to ask yourself which experience you'd rather have. I mean, if we all had a £5 disposable camera, or no camera, and we'd seen the things we'd seen because of urbex, would it all be worth it? My guess is that it would
Enter your email address to join: