All depends what you can do with it.awww c'mon who doesn't like a huge ****? lol
All depends what you can do with it.awww c'mon who doesn't like a huge ****? lol
I've have tried so hard not to reply . I didn't have to in the end!All depends what you can do with it.
Yeah I have done all the sites you too have visited, the GDR throws up some amazing places to visit. I shall eventually get round to uploading!!That's great, it has hints of sites in the former E Germany from exploring years past, such as Krampnitz, Wünsdorf and Altes Lager. I've always been intrigued by Kaliningrad, I think you can visit from Finland for 72 hours without needing a visa? Wouldn't get too excited about armed guards – lots of police on the continent carry side arms.
We once navigated Box Mine by ***** graff alone!Not just spunking, huge penises
Some really good stuff...
Would that be Cricket Box Mine? Or one for ball clay? In the 1950s one could navigate around Buckfastleigh by pubs only.We once navigated Box Mine by ***** graff alone!
good point well madeHaving recently spent another two weeks around the BCN I despair with the graffiti situation. There's some really talented artists and some excellent murals underneath major boring concrete structures such as M54 and Spaghetti Junction bridges. But the senseless 'tagging' on almost everything drove us mad. Beautiful ironwork bridges declaring 'Horsley Ironworks' and the like — scribbled all over. Beautiful brickwork and iconic signage — scribbled over.
But who defines what is 'good grafitti' and what is 'bad grafitti'? As with who decides what buildings should be preserved and what demolished? There are many churches and chapels that could be demolished and the land used for modern housing, instead of concreting over farm fields. Of course, it would reduce the number of place to be explored!good point well made
I'm definitely putting huge ***** graffiti in the bad categoryBut who defines what is 'good grafitti' and what is 'bad grafitti'? As with who decides what buildings should be preserved and what demolished? There are many churches and chapels that could be demolished and the land used for modern housing, instead of concreting over farm fields. Of course, it would reduce the number of place to be explored!
True. But often the senseless tagging over an iconic structure just comes across as vandalism. Here’s one of the Horseley Ironworks bridges, and one of the few canal mileage signs that hasn’t been obliterated.But who defines what is 'good grafitti' and what is 'bad grafitti'? As with who decides what buildings should be preserved and what demolished? There are many churches and chapels that could be demolished and the land used for modern housing, instead of concreting over farm fields. Of course, it would reduce the number of place to be explored!
Enter your email address to join: