Who had Santa bring them a 3DTV? - 3D Urbex pics.
- Thread starter magmo
- Start date
Help Support Derelict Places:
krela
Well-known member
Chances of me buying a 50" TV. Zero... 
Chances of me wearing glasses to watch TV. Also zero.
My interest in 3d tv. Also Zero.
It's just not that appealing, it just doesn't add a whole lot.
I've seen 5 3d films at the cinema including the 2 really big supposedly best of the best ones, in fact I saw the new Scorcese 3d film "hugo" last week, and it's really no more exciting than watching in 2d. It's not like you can actually walk round the 'scene' and find your own angles etc, it's just that the picture has a tiny bit more depth than it does in 2d which gets very gimmicky very quickly.
Plus the gratuitous bits they put in 3d films like soot, and snow etc just get on my tits. It's so contrived.
Chances of me wearing glasses to watch TV. Also zero.
My interest in 3d tv. Also Zero.
It's just not that appealing, it just doesn't add a whole lot.
I've seen 5 3d films at the cinema including the 2 really big supposedly best of the best ones, in fact I saw the new Scorcese 3d film "hugo" last week, and it's really no more exciting than watching in 2d. It's not like you can actually walk round the 'scene' and find your own angles etc, it's just that the picture has a tiny bit more depth than it does in 2d which gets very gimmicky very quickly.
Plus the gratuitous bits they put in 3d films like soot, and snow etc just get on my tits. It's so contrived.
TeeJF
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2011
- Messages
- 2,884
- Reaction score
- 3,095
Amen to that! Do you remeber the gore dripping axes and swords and the like in the old twin colour 3D horrors of the 60s and 70s?
As to the succes or iminent demise, well only time will tell!
krela
Well-known member
Sorry Magmo we've completely derailed your thread. =/
Although I'm not a fan of 3D either.. ******* 3D was amazing.
Is it just me, or are these photos L:R rather than R:L? Meaning that you have to use the straight eye technique rather than the much easier cross eye technique to view them?
TeeJF
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2011
- Messages
- 2,884
- Reaction score
- 3,095
Or just get bladdered before you look at them then the cross eyed technique isn't required at all...
They are left right because they are for viewing on a 3d tv and that is how the are ordwered for that, if you try to view them cross eyed you will get a headace.
mo
No problem... Debate is good though a lot of peoples only experience of 3d has been full length films where still pictures playd back in high res through a HDMI 1.4 conection is very good.
One thing I do agree on and it is the same case for HDR and that is that it can be over done. Some subjects are great in it, the wrong subject can be crap. I think a subject such as Pystock would be ideal.
I see you said you had seen 5 3D films, that is 5 more than I have
Anotrher thing that some people seen to think is that 3D photography is a new fad, it has been around for over 100 years in one form or another, I have been into 3D photography since I was 11.
My camera has a Lenticular lens on the lcd panel, like the Nintedo 3d but higher res and you don't need glasses, whe the screens get larger and cheaper that willbe the next step, but not the final step.
It is good that everyone has given an opinion and it would be a boring world if everyone had the same opinion.
Happy New year.
mo
Similar threads
